(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested and the following response was obtained: - was there any adverse consequence associated with the patient? not reported.H3 analysis summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Visual inspection evaluation was conducted on the returned device.The returned sample determined that it was received, one needle suture piece that pertain to product code (b)(6).During visual inspection of the returned sample, it was observed that the needle was noted to be broken at the tip area.This condition caused a dull needle.This sample will be shipped to hsa for further analysis due to the needle breakage.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this lot-serial number were reviewed, and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this batch.No conclusion could be reached due to the sample needs additional evaluation by hsa.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Additional h3 analysis summary (b03): the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional test evaluation were conducted on the returned device.The returned samples determined that it received four unopened samples that pertain to product code (b)(6).In order to evaluate the condition of the returned sample, the packaging foil was opened.No defects were detected on the product; the swage and attachment area was noted to be as expected.The returned needles were noted to be the corresponding to prime needle for the (b)(6) product code.No damages or needle deformation were observed during the visual inspection.The needles were passed through a tissue simulator and no abnormalities were noted.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.A review of the batch manufacturing records was conducted, and no related non-conformances were identified.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H3 investigation summary: the product received for analysis was identified as product code vcp494h.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A fracture was observed at the tip of the needle.One side of the needle was received, the mating fracture surface was not provided for this evaluation.The needle was noted with marks that appears to be by surgical instrument.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surface and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of the sample revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.This was a ductile fracture.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred at the tip of the needle during use due to tensile overload.There is no evidence of any material flaw or defect that would cause premature failure.In order to avoid this kind of damage grasp the needle in an area one-third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the distance from the attachment end to the point.The needle breakage was confirmed.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|