• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. THUNDERBEAT OPEN FINE JAW TYPE X; ULTRASONIC SURGICAL DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. THUNDERBEAT OPEN FINE JAW TYPE X; ULTRASONIC SURGICAL DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number TB-0009OFX
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/30/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned and the evaluation found the tissue pad was worn and partially peeled off.The cover at the tip of the grip had come off.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during therapeutic thyroidectomy the tissue pad of the thunderbeat open fine jaw peeled off.There was no internal shedding of the device.A similar new device was replaced and the procedure was completed.The procedure was prolonged by 1 to 1.5 hours to replace with the new device.There were no health hazards reported to the patient.The device was inspected and there were no faults reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.Additionally, to provide a correction to the initial with information inadvertently left out (b5), and to provide additional information received (b5), and to provide a correction to fields (b1 and h6-impact code).Correction to the initial supplemental report as based on the provided information this event is not considered a serious injury.However, this event will remain a product problem.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation and past investigation results, a likely mechanism casing the tissue pad peeling might be the following: 1)during the output activation in seal & cut mode, nothing was grasped in between the grasping section and the distal end of the probe (this includes after tissue resection).Therefore, the tissue pad was worn out.2) due to friction between the grasping section and the distal end of the probe, abnormal heat was generated.This might have caused the tissue pad to partially peel off.Based on the results of replication testing, it is suggested that the distal cover became detached either during the procedure or during cleaning when other tools or equipment entered the gap between the non-insulated area and the distal cover.However, the specific circumstances of the occurrence could not be determined, and the root cause of the phenomenon could not be identified.The event can be prevented by following the instructions for use which state: "do not activate output in seal & cut mode while the grasping section is closed without contacting tissue or vessel, or ensuring that tissue is transected.Otherwise, a local increase of the temperature due to a friction between the probe tip and the grasping section may result in various forms of damage in the probe tip and/or the tissue pad, such as premature wear, breakage, deformation, and/or falling off inside the body cavity and/or partial separating." "when cutting and vessel sealing is performed in seal & cut mode, apply light tension on the tissue so that users can confirm that they are transected.Also, stop activation immediately after tissue is transected.Otherwise, the grasping section, the tissue pad, or the probe tip may break and fall off, and partial separating of the tissue pad may occur due to a local increase of temperature caused by the friction between tissue pad and the probe tip during activation." "the thunderbeat instrument should be used for soft tissue.Do not activate output while grasping hard tissue such as bone or highly calcified tissue, or hard objects such as metal clips, stapler, other instruments, or forceps, and others.Otherwise, it may cause the probe tip to be scratched or come into direct contact with the metal area of the grasping section as the heat generated by the friction between the hard object and the probe tip could cause wear/deforming/split/protruding/partial separating of the tissue pad.In turn, the probe tip may break before displaying an error window or generating an alarm tone." "during output, do not grasp or let the probe tip contact hard objects such as metal clips, stapler, or other instruments.Also, be careful to avoid contacting the probe tip with those accidentally.Particularly during activation, a scratch on the probe tip could occur due to ultrasonic vibration, which leads the probe tip to break and fall off into the body cavity.In addition, the high-frequency (rf bipolar) current flows through the metal and generates spark discharge, which may cause burns and decrease functionalities, which may lead to burns of the tissue by a high-frequency leak current output due to destruction of the insulation structure." olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Event Description
Additional information received: it was reported that it did not take 1 to 1.5 hours to replace the device; rather, the malfunction occurred about 1 to 1.5 hours into the procedure.The patient has been discharged from the hospital.No reports on hospital stay extended due to the device malfunction.No special medical intervention (i.E.Treatment outside the scope of the procedure) was required because of the reported problem.Information inadvertently left out: it was reported that the intelligent tissue monitoring (itm) was "off".The generator settings for were seal & cut 1 and seal 1.No delay in the procedure and no additional anesthesia required due to the device malfunction.The device and the connections to the generator were inspected prior to use.The transducer cords and other medical device cords (e.G.Electrocardiographs) are not tied together.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THUNDERBEAT OPEN FINE JAW TYPE X
Type of Device
ULTRASONIC SURGICAL DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer (Section G)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18715216
MDR Text Key335523992
Report Number9614641-2024-00390
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K211838
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/15/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/15/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberTB-0009OFX
Device Lot Number38K29
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/06/2024
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/29/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
THUNDERBEAT TRANSDUCER TD-TB400 , SN-UNK; ULTRASONIC GENERATOR, USG-400, SN-UNK
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-