Catalog Number 22438-19 |
Device Problems
Retraction Problem (1536); Material Separation (1562); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/25/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a mildly calcified, mildly tortuous internal carotid artery that is 90% stenosed.After stent deployment it was noted that the recovery of the filter from the emboshield nav6 was slight difficult with the recovery catheter; however, once the filter was removed with the recovery catheter, the nylon membrane on the outer filter was noted to be torn.There was no adverse patient effects reported and no clinically significant delay.No additional information provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequently, after the initial was filed it was noted the tip separated; however, was discarded.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Visual analysis was performed on the returned product.The reported retraction problem was unable to be confirmed as it was related to procedural circumstances.The torn filtration element was confirmed.The material separation of the polyimide tip which was reported to have been discarded by the physician was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history revealed no other similar complaints reported from this lot.Based on the reported event description and evaluation of the returned unit, a definitive cause for the reported retraction problem could not be determined.It may be possible that anatomical conditions contributed to the difficulty retracting the filter into the retrieval catheter causing damage to the filtration element.However, this could not be confirmed.The separation of the filter tip (polyimide olive) was not initially reported and may have occurred during additional handling outside of the patient.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|