• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONMED LARGO ERGO 2-BUTTON SHAVER HANDPIECE; MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONMED LARGO ERGO 2-BUTTON SHAVER HANDPIECE; MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number D4240
Device Problem Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device is being returned to conmed for evaluation.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the device evaluation and complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the device, d4240, ergo 2-button shaver handpiece, was being tested during pre-op testing on an unknown date when it was reported, ¿the product overheats.¿.There was no report of injury, medical intervention, or hospitalization for the user and there was no patient involvement.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the device, d4240, ergo 2-button shaver handpiece, was being tested during pre-op testing on an unknown date when it was reported, ¿the product overheats.¿.There was no report of injury, medical intervention, or hospitalization for the user and there was no patient involvement.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was overdue for preventative maintenance.Additionally, the motor was seized and the cable was bad.The device was repaired, tested, and met all specifications.While a root cause cannot be identified, the likely cause of the event based on the ifu is that preventative maintenance was not performed in a timely fashion.A device history review (dhr) review was not conducted as the device has been in the field for greater than 12 months.The service history was reviewed and found similar repairs to this complaint.(b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: failure to follow the specified service interval could result in reduced instrument performance or overheating of the handpiece.Overheating can lead to possible burn injury to the patient or medical personnel.Rotation of handpiece usage per day will assist with proper performance.The shaver handpieces shall be returned every 12 months for servicing.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERGO 2-BUTTON SHAVER HANDPIECE
Type of Device
MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONMED LARGO
11311 concept blvd
largo FL 33773
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONMED LARGO
11311 concept blvd
largo FL 33773
Manufacturer Contact
john berga
11311 concept blvd
largo, FL 33773
7273995358
MDR Report Key18719795
MDR Text Key336620577
Report Number1017294-2024-00022
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEY
UDI-Device Identifier10845854013144
UDI-Public(01)10845854013144(11)170405(30)1
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAR
PMA/PMN Number
K050519
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/02/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/16/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberD4240
Device Lot NumberLAA11058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/19/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/05/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-