Catalog Number 22-4038 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/13/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a shoulder arthroscopy, before using the firstpass device into the patient, it was noticed that the needle was broken.The procedure was successfully completed using a back-up device.There was a surgical delay less than 30 minutes and no further complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: h3, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected data: h6: health effect - impact code.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual evaluation showed the device was not returned in original packaging.Bio debris is present in the suture capture and jaw.No other visible defect.A functional evaluation showed pulling the lever will close and lock the jaw.Pulling the lever and trigger simultaneously will deploy the suture passer needle as intended.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the investigation.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, or an impact event inconsistent with normal use.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|