The device was returned for analysis.The reported malposition of device was unable to be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.Electronic lot history record (elhr) and corrective and preventive action (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot level product quality issue.As there was no damage noted to the device during the inspection prior to use, the investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that during advancement, interaction with the moderately calcified, moderately tortuous and 90% stenosed anatomy and/or inadvertent mishandling resulted in the noted device damages (multiple shaft bends, kinked shaft); thus as the stent was being deployed prevented the shaft lumens from moving freely resulting in the stent to jump in a spring like release; resulting in the reported malposition of device (stent jumped and was placed half distal to the lesion and is partially inside the target lesion).Based on the reported information and results of the complaint investigation there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|