• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. SINGLE USE MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPTOR V

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. SINGLE USE MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPTOR V Back to Search Results
Model Number BML-V437QR-30
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pancreatitis (4481)
Event Date 11/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) received a literature titled "addition of mechanical lithotripsy to endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in patients with difficult common bile duct stones: a retrospective single-center study."     ¿literature summary¿ this retrospective study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (eplbd) with and without mechanical lithotripsy (ml) in removing difficult common bile duct stones.A total of 122 patients were included (n = 44, eplbd + ml and n = 78, eplbd).Compared with the eplbd group, the eplbd + ml group required more endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedures (¿2) (86% versus 67%) and longer total ercp time after reaching the papilla (78.5 minutes versus 25 minutes).Methods: patients with difficult common bile duct stones treated with eplbd, with or without ml, at the (b)(6) center between (b)(6) 2014 and (b)(6) 2020, were retrospectively evaluated.The rates of cumulative recurrence and complications were compared between the two groups.Results: overall, 122 patients (n = 44, eplbd + ml and n = 78, eplbd) treated by 12 gastroenterologists were included.Patients in the eplbd + ml group were older (85 years versus 81.5 years) and had larger maximum stone diameter (15 mm versus 12.5 mm) than those in the eplbd group.Compared with the eplbd group, the eplbd + ml group required more endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedures (¿2) (86% versus 67%) and longer total ercp time after reaching the papilla (78.5 minutes versus 25 minutes).Complication rates were not significantly different (9.1% versus 12.8%); however, the cumulative recurrence rates were higher in the eplbd + ml group than in the eplbd group (69.4% versus 23.5% at 4 years).Conclusion: although there were no differences in complication rates, the long-term recurrence rate was higher in the eplbd + ml group than in the eplbd group.This study emphasizes the added burden imposed by performing ml during ercp and suggests that by appropriate case selection, it is possible to treat cases of difficult biliary stones using eplbd without ml.  ¿type of adverse events/number of patients¿ event1: pancreatitis (eplbd + ml group) 3 cases event2: cholangitis (eplbd + ml group) 1 case event3: pancreatitis (eplbd group) 4 cases event4: cholangitis (eplbd group) 6 cases.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The literature described mechanical lithotripter, hence olympus selected bml-v437qr-30 as representative model.This report is related to the following linked patient identifiers.(b)(6).Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with the device evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation and correction to the initial with information inadvertently left out (b3).The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse events cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPTOR V
Type of Device
SINGLE USE MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPTOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer (Section G)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18743701
MDR Text Key335813779
Report Number9614641-2024-00423
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
CLASS2-EXMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/20/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberBML-V437QR-30
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
DUODENOSCOPE : TJF-260V, SN -UNK; STONE RETRIEVAL BASKET : FG-V435P, SN- UNK; VISIGLIDE 2 GUIDEWIRE : G-260-3545A, SN -UNK
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-