Catalog Number 80202 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/20/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo and a video were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure, the device allegedly stopped suctioning.It was further reported that the tip end of the catheter allegedly separated from the spring of the catheter.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical sample was not received for evaluation and hence, a physical investigation was not possible.The user report contains information regarding helix break and mechanical jam of the catheter.The user provided video/image do not clearly show helix break.Due to no physical sample provided the reported helix break can not be confirmed as video/image do not fully illustrate helix break.However, the provided video shows the mechanical jam of the catheter and therefore, can be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported mechanical jam issue.A clear root cause could not be identified but a blockage of the catheter represents a known inherent risk.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a thrombectomy and atherectomy procedure in the right common femoral artery lesion, the device allegedly stopped suctioning.It was further reported that the tip end of the catheter was allegedly found to be separated from the spring of the catheter.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|