• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND TURBOHAWK PLUS; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND TURBOHAWK PLUS; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Embolism/Embolus (4438)
Event Date 01/26/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
D10 continued: inpact admiral drug coated balloon; spider fx embolic protection medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
A phya physician was attempting to use a turbo hawk plus atherectomy device during treatment of 400mm plaque lesion in the patient¿s left proximal mid distal superficial femoral artery (sfa), popliteal artery (pop), tibial/popliteal trunk (tpt), and posterior tibial artery (pta).Moderate vessel tortuosity and moderate vessel calcification were reported.Lesion exhibited cto (chronic total occlusion-100%) stenosis.Artery diameter reported as 6-3mm.There were no abnormalities reported in relation to anatomy.The device was inspected with no issues noted.The device was prepped per the ifu with no issues identified.Physician crossed subintimal in sfa and pop re-entered into true lumen into tpt, predilitated the whole cto segment with a 3x150 nanocross.A 4mm spider was placed into distal pt.Several passes were made and a bend of blade was noticed angiographically.Once physician tried to remove the device, resistance was felt coming into the sheath.Device was torqued several times and gently removed.Once outside of the patient the bulge on the nose cone was physically visible.Device was cleaned per ifu and soft plaque was extracted.A new device was open to complete the hawking.After the second device was used to hawk out the plaque, a 3x150 pta was used in tpt and pt and a 5x150 ipa was used in pop and sfa.After angiogram, emboli was identified in the spider filter.Once the filter was removed, another emboli was identified inthe distal pt.An 035 trailblazer was advanced into distal pt and after several attempts to aspirate, the emboli was removed with vessel patent.It is not clear at what stage the embolism occurred what device may have have contributed to it.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TURBOHAWK PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18766689
MDR Text Key336103194
Report Number9612164-2024-00920
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K212027
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/26/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/23/2024
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
TURBOHAWK ATHERECTOMY TH PLUS 6F,
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-