The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Based on available information, the reported image resolution poor was associated with difficult imaging.The cause of the reported perforation, associated with the atrial septal defect (asd) occurred after sgc (steerable guide catheter) removal, could not be determined.The reported patient effect of perforation, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported unexpected medical intervention was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
It was reported this was a mitraclip procedure to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4+, a rotated heart, and restricted bi-leaflets.It was noted imaging was challenging throughout the procedure.A steerable guide catheter (sgc) (31005r1009) and an xtw clip (31019r1057) were inserted.However, due to a high transseptal puncture the trajectory was not satisfactory, and the clip was unable to advance.Therefore, the clip was removed and replaced.The physician decided to remove and re-prepare the sgc.The sgc and a new xtw clip (31031a1030) were inserted.However, the clip was unable to advance due to the high transseptal puncture and an aorta hugger.Therefore, the clip was removed.However, after removal of the sgc, an atrial septal defect (asd) occurred.For treatment, a closure device was implanted.The procedure was discontinued, and mr remained at a grade of 4+.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.
|