• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problem Visual Prompts will not Clear (2281)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/01/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During device check after a patient call, the autopulse platform (sn (b)(6) displayed user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large).No patient information nor adverse effects were reported.No patient involvement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported complaint that the autopulse platform (sn (b)(6) displayed user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) was confirmed during both archive data review and functional testing.The root cause of the ua07 was due to failed load cell #2, likely attributed to the age of the platform, failed components, or mishandling such as a drop.The autopulse platform was manufactured in january 2008 and is over 16 years old, well beyond its expected service life of 5 years.Visual inspection of the returned autopulse platform did not show any apparent physical damage.Further inspection revealed that the encoder driveshaft could not rotate smoothly, unrelated to the reported complaint.The root cause of the observed issue was the worn-out integrated encoder gearbox, likely attributed to the age of the platform.The integrated encoder gearbox was replaced to resolve the problem.A review of the archive data showed multiple user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) around the customer's reported event date, confirming the reported complaint.Functional testing failed due to the ua07 advisory message displayed upon powering up the platform, confirming the reported complaint.A load cell characterization test was performed and indicated that load cell #2 was over-reporting, and it was replaced to remedy the fault.Following service, another load cell characterization test was performed and confirmed that both cell modules were functioning within the specification.The autopulse platform was subjected to a final run-in test using the 95% large resuscitation test fixture (lrtf) with known good test batteries until discharged without any fault or error.Historical complaints were reviewed for service information related to the reported complaint, and there were no similar complaints reported for the autopulse platform with serial number (b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
kim thoa nguyen
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose, CA 95131
4084192922
MDR Report Key18785368
MDR Text Key336417412
Report Number3010617000-2024-00170
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/26/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0730-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/16/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/02/2008
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-