This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: h4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.(b)(4) as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: the investigation has been updated to reflect the correct information: investigation summary according to the information received, it was reported that during the surgery, the rigidfix was found to be bent and breakage(as the photo shows.No additional information could be provided.¿ ¿the product has not returned to depuy synthes mitek, however photos were provided for review.See attachments (¿¿.Jpg, ¿¿¿.Jpg) ¿ the photo investigation revealed that two rigidfix fem 3.3mm s/t xpin were shown.One device was broken at the medial part of the device, the other pin does not show any anomalies.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the rigidfix fem 3.3mm s/t xpin would contribute to the complained device issue.¿ based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to a procedural variable, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure.As per ifu- 104144, use instructions are provided, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|