• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Delayed Charge Time (2586); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/10/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).Pt indicates it takes them a long time to locate the ins when they want to start a charge session.Pt also indicates it takes a long time to charge their ins, about 3 hours, from 0 to 100% thought pt does keep screen lit up while charging ins.Tss coached pt to let screen go dark and only check charge quality occasionally.Pt says they do see excellent recharge quality while charging their ins.Pt has lost some weight but caller says ins is not loose in pocket but not tight either, somewhere in between.Otherwise, ins is shallow and parallel to the skin.Pt thinks this has been occurring since implant.Tss also reviewed making sure pt is placing recharger over the main part of ins battery and avoiding putting it over the header block.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep).It was reported that they showed the patient proper charging technique with the physician.Rep reported the issue was not due to weight loss based on what the physician said, and the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was not too shallow.Rep reported the ins issue could have been due to the placement of the stim on her back, but that was the only info the doctor gave them.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key18797426
MDR Text Key336855221
Report Number3004209178-2024-05890
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/21/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/28/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2022
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/28/2024
Date Device Manufactured11/17/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-