• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9610TF23
Device Problem Failure to Align (2522)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 11/25/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is still ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported by the field clinical specialist (fcs), during a transfemoral tavr procedure with a 23mm sapien 3 valve, the valve was not correctly aligned on the balloon, and it was inflated asymmetrically, leading to a valve low position of 30/70 (aortic/ventricular).There was no additional actions taken at the time of the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction to h6 based on additional information.The device was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.The ifu, current risk mitigations include design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed, no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.In this case, the reported event of the valve not being between the alignment markers and deployed was unable to be confirmed due to the device or appropriate imagery not being returned/provided.Per the event description, the valve was not between the alignment markers prior to valve deployment.If the crimped valve was not within the internal shoulders prior to deployment, the deployed valve could be inflated asymmetrically, and thus, pushed towards aorta and/or left ventricle during the deployment, leading to the reported low valve positioning (30/70).Per the training manual, 'slowly rotate the fine adjustment wheel towards you to center the thv exactly between the valve alignment markers with no gap or overlap'.'check to ensure: thv is exactly between the valve alignment markers'.As such, available information suggests that use error (not following ifu/training manual) may have contributed to the complaint event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18799694
MDR Text Key336863804
Report Number2015691-2024-01412
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/28/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/27/2021
Device Model Number9610TF23
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age86 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-