|
Catalog Number RBYPODJ30 |
Device Problems
Failure to Fold (1255); Premature Separation (4045)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/25/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation of the returned pod pc confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly.Evaluation revealed that the pet lock was separated, and the pull wire was retracted out of the pusher assembly distal tip.If the pet lock is inadvertently separated and the pull wire is retracted out of the pusher assembly distal tip, the embolization coil will detach from its pusher assembly.The complaint indicated that the pod pc had been pulled back several times.This likely contributed to the separation of the pet lock.Further evaluation of the device revealed that the embolization coil had offset coil winds throughout its length.If the pod pc is advanced against resistance, damage such as this may occur.This damage may have contributed to the reported issue of the pod pc not fitting into the target vessel.Further evaluation also revealed a kink in the pusher assembly.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the internal iliac artery (iia) using a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern), pod packing coils (pod pc), and a non-penumbra sheath.It should be noted that the patient¿s anatomy was moderately tortuous.During the procedure, the physician successfully implanted two non-penumbra coils and four pod pcs into the target vessel using the lantern.Another coil was advanced to the target vessel; however, the pod pc would not take its intended shape.After several strokes of pulling the pod pc back, the pod pc unintentionally detached within the lantern.Therefore, the lantern containing the pod pc was removed.It was reported that the pod pc was flushed out of the lantern.The procedure was completed using a new pod pc, the same lantern, and the same sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|