• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MEDTRONIC TRANSCATHETER VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MEDTRONIC TRANSCATHETER VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number MDT-TRANS VALVE
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Atrial Fibrillation (1729); Atrial Flutter (1730); Cardiac Arrest (1762); Stroke/CVA (1770); Non specific EKG/ECG Changes (1817); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Myocardial Infarction (1969); Transient Ischemic Attack (2109); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Event Date 11/13/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Literature was reviewed regarding the relationship between fluoroscopy time and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr).Medtronic (corevalve, engager, evolut r, evolut pro, and evolut pro+) and non-medtronic (various) transcatheter valve types were used in the study.The authors observed a total of 102 deaths within one year of tavr.No evidence was presented to suggest that a medtronic valve or its function contributed to any of the deaths.Other adverse outcomes consisted of bleeding, transfusions, vascular complications (minor or major), access site related vascular complications, residual aortic regurgitation (at least moderate), permanent pacemaker implantation, external cardiac massage/cardiac arrest, new atrial fibrillation/flutter, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack, extended hospital stay, prolonged fluoroscopy time, acute kidney injury (with or without continuous venovenous hemofiltration), and chronic hemodialysis.No additional adverse outcomes were noted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: this is a system report.The section d information is for the primary device, which was in use with the following: medtronic transcatheter delivery system, product id: mdt-trans dcs, lot number(s): unknown.Citation: cafaro a, spione f, burattini o, et al.Fluoroscopy time as a new predictor of short-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.J cardiovasc dev dis.2023;10(11):459.Published 2023 nov 13.Doi:10.3390/jcdd10110459 earliest date of publication used for date of event.Fda approved medtronic products referenced: corevalve (product code npt, pma# p130021), evolut r (product code npt, pma# p130021), evolut pro (product code npt, pma# p130021), and evolut pro+ (product code npt, pma# p130021).Earliest approved product used for product code and pma#.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the corresponding author indicated that none of the adverse events or deaths observed in the study were exclusively linked to a medtronic device.No further information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated information: b5.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDTRONIC TRANSCATHETER VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18822328
MDR Text Key336736104
Report Number2025587-2024-01319
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMDT-TRANS VALVE
Device Catalogue NumberMDT-TRANS VALVE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/20/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/01/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/17/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/18/2024
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
"SEE H11...."
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-