• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 3 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 3 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33630023
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Cyst(s) (1800); Osteopenia/ Osteoporosis (2651); Implant Pain (4561); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Event Date 11/19/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient may need to undergo a revision surgery due to pain and swelling of the ankle.Ct scans show cystic changes in the tibia and talus with loss of bone density.Implants are currently still implanted, with plans for a revision soon - estimate in early june.The patient mentioned that the ankle will be removed and replaced with cadaver bone and will under go an ankle fusion.Patient was on a 10-day cruise in europe when he first experienced swelling.Patient states there was no traumatic event to his ankle.He notes he walked a bit more during the cruise (12,000 steps/day)compared to when he was at home (~8000 steps/day) but nothing significant.He notes no strenuous activities during the cruise that could have contributed to this event.Currently, the patient can walk on the ankle but wears a boot to limit the "shearing" action to the ankle.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the available information the device remains implanted therefore an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.A review of the device history is not possible because the lot number was not communicated.Should additional information become available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.H3 other text : device remains implanted in patient.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient may need to undergo a revision surgery due to pain and swelling of the ankle.Ct scans show cystic changes in the tibia and talus with loss of bone density.Implants are currently still implanted, with plans for a revision soon - estimate in early june.The patient mentioned that the ankle will be removed and replaced with cadaver bone and will under go an ankle fusion.Patient was on a 10-day cruise in europe when he first experienced swelling.Patient states there was no traumatic event to his ankle.He notes he walked a bit more during the cruise (12,000 steps/day)compared to when he was at home (~8000 steps/day) but nothing significant.He notes no strenuous activities during the cruise that could have contributed to this event.Currently, the patient can walk on the ankle but wears a boot to limit the "shearing" action to the ankle.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed based on available medical record and medical expert assessment.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Medical records and the radiology reports were also reviewed by the hcp, and there is nothing that really stands out, other than the cyst formation around implant in both tibia and talus.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed ¿all tar components look intact.There is significant periprosthetic cyst formation as well in the tibia as in the talus, which is an indication for revision (such bone loss is frequently progressive)¿ based on the investigation the root cause can be attributed to the patient related issue.The failure was caused due to significant periprosthetic cyst formation in tibia as well as talus which is an indication for revision.Also, all the tar components are assessed as fixed by the hcp.If device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 3 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key18828295
MDR Text Key336802988
Report Number3010667733-2024-00133
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420122049
UDI-Public00840420122049
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33630023
Device Lot Number1591126
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/06/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/04/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/10/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/06/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured02/09/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight77 KG
-
-