Catalog Number 80202 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Leak/Splash (1354)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/06/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2023).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in through superior femoral artery through crossover approach, the device allegedly broke.It was further reported that the water was allegedly flushed out of the side hole on the catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a thrombectomy and atherectomy procedure in the superior femoral artery through crossover approach, the device allegedly broke.It was further reported that the water was allegedly flushed out of the side hole on the catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified.Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical sample was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a physical investigation was not possible.The user provided report and pictures/videos contain information regarding catheter break.After review of the user provided pictures/videos the reported malfunction can not be confirmed as it does not clearly show the break of the catheter.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported break and leak issues.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Expiration date: 07/2023.The information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|