• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM
Device Problems Over-Sensing (1438); Structural Problem (2506)
Patient Problems Arrhythmia (1721); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/25/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the data available at this time, there is no indication of a device malfunction causing or contributing to the inappropriate treatment.Inappropriate defibrillations are an anticipated risk associated with the use of the lifevest.Patients are instructed through alarms, voice messages, ifu, and training to press the response buttons to prevent an inappropriate defibrillation.The current commercial inappropriate defibrillation rate is consistent with the observed rate during the pivotal clinical trial (b)(4) (0.69% per patient-month with 90% confidence).A summary of the safety and effectiveness data (ssed), including the inappropriate defibrillation safety objective supporting fda's approval of the lifevest, can be found at http://www.Accessdata.Fda.Gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/p010030b.Pdf.The lifevest detection algorithm complies with iec 60601-2-4 performance requirements for sensitivity and specificity.
 
Event Description
The patient was inappropriately treated 1 time by the life vest.The patient was reportedly conscious at the time of the event.Motion artifact contributed to the false detection.The response buttons were pressed after the treatment was delivered.The response buttons functioned appropriately.The patient was driving a motorcycle at the time of the event.No injury was reported from the treatment.The patient went to the hospital for evaluation.The patient continued to use the lifevest.No deficiencies were alleged against the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation of electrode belt has been completed.The reported problem (unable to complete incoming testing) has been confirmed.Upon investigation the electrode belt trunk cable and dn to rear therapy electrode was severed, damaging all wires in the cable.The root cause for the severed cables was physical abuse.The device malfunction did not contribute to the adverse event.Based on the data available at this time, there is no indication of a device malfunction causing or contributing to the inappropriate treatment.Inappropriate defibrillations are an anticipated risk associated with the use of the lifevest.Patients are instructed through alarms, voice messages, ifu, and training to press the response buttons to prevent an inappropriate defibrillation.The current commercial inappropriate defibrillation rate is consistent with the observed rate during the pivotal clinical trial (b)(4) (0.69% per patient-month with 90% confidence).A summary of the safety and effectiveness data (ssed), including the inappropriate defibrillation safety objective supporting fda's approval of the lifevest, can be found at http://www.Accessdata.Fda.Gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/p010030b.Pdf.The lifevest detection algorithm complies with iec 60601-2-4 performance requirements for sensitivity and specificity.
 
Event Description
A us distributor reported that an electrode belt was unable to complete essential performance testing.The patient was inappropriately treated 1 time by the life vest.The patient was reportedly conscious at the time of the event.Motion artifact contributed to the false detection.The response buttons were pressed after the treatment was delivered.The response buttons functioned appropriately.The patient was driving a motorcycle at the time of the event.No injury was reported from the treatment.The patient went to the hospital for evaluation.The patient continued to use the life vest.No deficiencies were alleged against the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM
Type of Device
WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh PA 15238
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh PA
Manufacturer Contact
zoll mfg corporation
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh, PA 15238
MDR Report Key18844452
MDR Text Key336958045
Report Number3008642652-2024-02560
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MVK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P010030
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/27/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/06/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberLIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/25/2024
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-