Investigation: machine files were not provided for investigation.Original sample was available and analyzed accordingly.Review of device history record (dhr) revealed batch production record controls resulted with conformity.Non-conformity was not observed during manufacturing process.A 100% testing of each machine ensures that devices are delivered according to specifications.A blood contaminated mfc bloodline without blister package was received for investigation.Visual inspection: the sample was checked for component defect, conformity with the product specification.Leakage test: the sample was checked under air/liquid pressure for assembly failure and leakage.Review of instruction for use (ifu) and/or label noted that the described situation is adequately addressed in ifu and/or on the label.There is no indication that the reported failure relates to falsification.No information found that product is related to falsification or an unauthorized configuration.As result of examination, it was observed that there was rupture causing leakage on the membrane of the pressure dome.The complaint was admitted, however exact reason of the defect could not be determined.Raw material-based defect, improper connection of the pressure dome or handling process during treatment may be considered as possible reasons, but not limited to.
|