It was reported that a patient with a 25mm 11500a inspiris valve has been placed under evaluation for valve-in-valve intervention for unknown reasons after an implant duration of one (1) year, three (3) months due to unknown reasons.An aortic murmur was detected after an implant duration of one (1) year, two (2) months.
|
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
A device history record (dhr) review was not performed, as no information regarding a device failure mode was provided.Furthermore, there is no allegation of a malfunction which could be related to a manufacturing non-conformance and/or one was not suspected or confirmed through investigation; no labeling non-conformance/deficiency; no device-related infection; and no evidence of a product failure with regard to design, reliability, or use error.An engineering evaluation is not required because there is no allegation of a malfunction which could be related to a manufacturing non-conformance and/or one was not suspected or confirmed through investigation; no labeling non-conformance/deficiency; no use-related issue with a hazardous situation; no device-related infection; and no evidence of a product failure with regard to design, reliability, or use error.An ifu review is unable to be performed, as no details regarding failure mode of the device were provided.A capa/scar/pra is not required as there are no confirmed product or labeling non-conformances and no other triggers are met.Based on the information available, a definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined.
|