H4 manufacturing date added.H3 device evaluated by mfg updated.H3 summary attached updated.D4 expiration date added.Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes) system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During visual inspection the stent delivery wire (sdw) was noted to be kinked/bent in several locations.The stent introducer sheath distal tip was noted to be damaged.A 0.0158" mandrel was advanced through the microcatheter with no resistance noted.The stent was not returned with the device.Functional inspection to test the reported event: ¿stent deployed prematurely during use¿ was not required as the event was visually confirmed.Functional inspection to test the reported event: ¿stent difficult/unable to advance or pullback through catheter¿ was not performed as the stent was not returned for analysis.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported event 'stent deployed prematurely during use' was visually (indirectly) confirmed during inspection (it was not present still loaded on the sdw and was not present in the introducer sheath).The reported event 'stent difficult/unable to advance or pullback through catheter' could not be duplicated as the stent was not returned for analysis.However, the analysis results are consistent with the reported event.The device failed to meet specifications when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.Additional information provided by the customer indicated that the device was prepared as per the dfu.The device was confirmed to be in good condition prior to use on the patient.Continuous flush was set up and maintained throughout the clinical procedure.It was reported that the 'issue occurred during procedure during advancement through microcatheter- after introducing and before tiger stripes entered the stent introducer sheath but did not cause any patient issues/ no adverse consequences nor case delays.The stent deployed prematurely.It was swapped out for a new stent in the same size with no issues, as well as new microcatheter straight since the one used with this stent now had a stent inside of it and couldn't be used in the case'.The stent was not returned for analysis.The microcatheter lumen was inspected using a 0.0158" mandrel and the stent was not present inside it.The introducer sheath was returned and the distal tip had some minor damage present.The stent delivery wire (sdw) was also returned separately (not loaded inside the introducer sheath) and was kinked/bent at multiple points along its length.Given the minor damage noted to the distal tip opening of the introducer sheath and the deformation noted to the sdw, as well as the event description which notes friction while advancing (the stent) inside the microcatheter, it is possible that the introducer sheath was initially advanced slightly too far distally (which would cause minor deformation of the tip) but subsequently moved proximally prior to stent advancement out of the sheath.This would result in a gap between the distal end of the sheath and the microcatheter lumen.If this were to occur, it is likely that, during advancement of the stent to transfer it from the sheath into the proximal end of the microcatheter lumen, the stent would partially deploy into this gap.The user will then experience increased resistance while attempting to advance the stent through the microcatheter.This is one possible explanation to explain the analysis findings.An assignable cause of procedural factors has been assigned to the reported events: 'stent deployed prematurely during use' and 'stent difficult/unable to advance or pullback through catheter' and analysed events: ¿stent deployed prematurely during use¿, ¿sdw kinked/bent¿ and ¿stent introducer sheath distal tip damaged¿ as this complaint appears to be associated with a product that met the manufacturers design and manufacturing specifications and was reported to have been used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural factors during use.
|