• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT PRO PLUS VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT PRO PLUS VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVPROPLUS-26
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Perivalvular Leak (1457); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Cardiac Tamponade (2226); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Valvular Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4449); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Event Date 03/07/2024
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id: d-evprop23-29 (lot: 0011966159); product type: 0195-heart valves; product id: l-evprop23-29 (lot: 0011945516); product type: 0195-heart valves; product id: d-evprop23-29 (lot: 0011966159); product type: 0195-heart valves; product id: l-evprop23-29 (lot: 0011837018); product type: 0195-heart valves; section d references the main component of the system.Other medical products in use during the event include: brand name evolut pro plus valve; product id: evproplus-26 (serial: (b)(6); product type: 0195-heart valves; implant date: on (b)(6) 2024.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve (b)(6), the valve was released and aortic insufficiency was observed.It was decided to post dilate the valve and during the dilation the valve dislodged.A second valve (b)(6) was implanted and aortic insufficiency was also observed.Another post implant dilation was performed and during the dilation, tamponade was observed.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) and coronary recanalization were attempted.Subsequently the patient died.The cause of death was  tamponade.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that a pre-balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed.The aortic insufficiency after the first valve was moderate.It was reported that no cardiac tamponade was observed, however, a coronary occlusion occurred due to the valve dislodgement and second valve.After the second valve was implanted the aortic insufficiency decreased to mild.Per the physician, the cause of death was the coronary occlusion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
The physician confirmed the aortic insufficiency was classified as paravalvular leak (pvl).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated: b1, h6.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Image review: images were submitted to medtronic for review.Intra procedural fluoroscopic images and a mpxr questionnaire were provided for review.The patient¿s executive summary was provided for anatomical review.The patient¿s annulus perimeter measured 69.2mm with a perimeter derived diameter of 22mm suggesting a size 26mm evolut valve.The aortic valve leaflets appeared to be significantly calcified; however, there was no evidence that a pre balloon aortic valvuloplasty was performed prior to the valve implant.The valve was deployed to just prior the point of no recapture and depth assessment was performed.The depth at the non-coronary cusp was approximately 1mm in the cusp overlap view and 3mm at the left-coronary cusp in the left anterior oblique view.The valve appeared to be under expanded/constrained in the cusp overlap view which would warrant a recapture.The valve was released which resulted in dislodgment to the level of the sinuses.There is no evidence that snaring the dislodged valve was attempted, which resulted in complete occlusion of the coronary arteries when the second valve was implanted, as evident by the reviewed images.It was also reported that tamponade was observed, but it is not possible to confirm on the fluoroscopic images provided.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT PRO PLUS VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18882899
MDR Text Key337402298
Report Number2025587-2024-01530
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAR
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/29/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEVPROPLUS-26
Device Catalogue NumberEVPROPLUS-26
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/07/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/11/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/15/2024
03/15/2024
05/23/2024
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/18/2024
03/21/2024
05/23/2024
05/29/2024
Date Device Manufactured11/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H11...
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight55 KG
-
-