Trackwise#: (b)(4).Corrected sections: h6--medical device ¿ problem code corrected from code "4580" to "2981." the device was returned to the factory for evaluation on 03/15/2024.An investigation was conducted on 03/19/2024.A visual inspection was conducted.Both the harvesting device and cannula was returned for evaluation.The harvesting device was returned inside the cannula.The tip of the harvesting device was observed to be bent forward.Signs of clinical use and evidence of blood was observed.The c-ring was observed to be intact with no visual defects observed.A mechanical evaluation was conducted.The tip of the shaft was moved back into its normal position without any visual or physical difficulties observed.There were no visual defects observed on the intact clear silicone insulation on both the cold and hot jaws.The heater wire was observed to be flexed and bent away from the hot jaw from the base of the hot jaw with detachment at the tip of the hot jaw.An electrical evaluation was conducted.A pre-cautery test was performed per the direction for use (dfu) with a reference cable, adapter, and reference power supply vh-3010 at level 3.0.The device passed the pre-cautery test; it produced visible steam and heat during ten (10) 3-second activations and shut off when the toggle was released.To evaluate the safety shut down system, a polyfuse activation test was performed 5 times over 10 minutes.The device shut off after the period of sustained activation and reactivated after 10-second cooling period with no incident each time.An activation and transection capability test was performed over four (4) repetitions using "max life test method (b)(4).The device successfully transected tissue four (4) times.No final testing was conducted due to the condition of the heater wire.Based on the returned condition of the device, the reported failure "material twisted/bent wire " was confirmed as well as the analyzed failure "material twisted/ bent shaft" were observed.The lot # 3000357260 history record review was completed.There were no ncmrs, rework, or deviations documented for the reported lot number.Based on the dhr/lhr review results, it was determined that there is no relation between the batch manufacturing process and the reported failure.
|