• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ PMIC/ID-106; SYSTEM, TEST, AUTOMATED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ PMIC/ID-106; SYSTEM, TEST, AUTOMATED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 448606
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/21/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
H.3.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported while testing with bd phoenix¿ pmic/id-106, s.Aureus was misidentified as s.Epidermidis.There was no health impact or consequences reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6 investigation summary.This complaint is for misidentification of staphylococcus aureus as staphylococcus epidermidis when using phoenix panel pmic/id-106 (catalog number 448606) batch number 3192572.The customer did not return panels but provided isolates, phoenix generated lab reports and binary files for the investigation.To investigate, three retention panels each from the complaint batch were tested using customer returned isolates s.Aureus #1902 on a phoenix m50 machine and evaluated for identification results.Also, two control panels from the same material but different batch were tested using customer returned isolates s.Aureus #1902 on a phoenix m50 machine and evaluated for identification results.The five panels tested identified the isolate as s.Aureus, therefore, this complaint is not confirmed for misidentification.A review of the binary files was determined not to be required based on the results of the investigation.The batch history record was satisfactory and no quality notifications were generated during manufacturing and inspection.A review of complaints revealed three additional complaints on the complaint batch, two of which are related to this defect and unconfirmed.Complaint trending was performed, and no trends were identified associated with this defect.Bd will continue to monitor for trends and take action as necessary.Please continue to communicate any additional concerns.
 
Event Description
It was reported while testing with bd phoenix¿ pmic/id-106, s.Aureus was misidentified as s.Epidermidis.There was no health impact or consequences reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD PHOENIX¿ PMIC/ID-106
Type of Device
SYSTEM, TEST, AUTOMATED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
jo doyka
7 loveton circle
sparks, MD 21152
4103164000
MDR Report Key18895264
MDR Text Key337561589
Report Number1119779-2024-00200
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LON
UDI-Device Identifier30382904486069
UDI-Public(01)30382904486069
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020322
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number448606
Device Lot Number3192572
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/21/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/13/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/02/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/21/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/11/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-