• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON ACRYSOF MULTIPIECE IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON ACRYSOF MULTIPIECE IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number MA60AC
Device Problem Scratched Material (3020)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/14/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Two company lenses were returned adhered to each other and to the outside of the lens case.It cannot be determined which lens is for which file as the lenses are the same lot, diopter.The evaluations will be placed in both qs records.The lenses were numbers 1-2 for evaluation purposes.The lenses were cleaned with klrp to separate.Only one of the lenses was scratched.This lens had one haptic pulled from the optic.The second haptic was bent gusset area.A narrow scratch was observed on the posterior optic surface.The optic was also broken on the edge with material removed at the insertion area of the removed haptic.Multiple scratches were observed in this area.The scratches travel from the edge inward.These scratches are not in the travel/fold path.These appear to have been cause by an instrument used to grasp the lens.Two small parallel cracks were also observed in the center of the optic (anterior and posterior).This damage also appears to have been caused by an instrument used to grasp the lens.The second used company lens also had one haptic pulled from the optic.The optic was cracked in the haptic insertion area.The second haptic was bent-gusset area.The optic was torn in this haptic insertion area.No scratches were observed.The used company cartridges were not returned.Seven unopened company cartridges were returned for the reported lot.One unopened sample was pulled randomly for testing.The unopened company cartridge was microscopically examined with no damage or abnormalities observed.No particulate was observed inside the cartridge.The cartridge was functionally tested per the dfu (directions for use) using a qualified handpiece, company, 22.5 diopter lens and viscoelastic.The cartridge was filled with viscoelastic per the ifu.The lens was loaded and biased down.The lens was advanced making sure the plunger was in the correct position in contact with the trailing optic edge.No lens or cartridge damage was observed after the lens delivery.The company cartridge was cleaned for further evaluation.Topcoat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.The associated cartridge was qualified.Two viscoelastics were indicated it is unknown which was used in the cartridge.The handpiece model was not provided.It is unknown if a qualified handpiece was used.Product history records were reviewed and the documentation indicated the product met release criteria.The root cause could not be determined for the reported scratches.Only one of the returned company lenses was scratched.This lens had multiple areas of damage, which were not it the lens fold/travel path.The damage appeared to have been caused by instruments used to grasp the lens.Both lenses had haptics pulled from the optic and bent haptics.All four haptic insertion areas were damaged.The used company cartridges were not returned.One of the returned unopened company cartridges was evaluated.No damage or abnormalities were observed.Functional and dye stain testing was conducted with the unopened sample with acceptable results.No lens or cartridge damage was observed after the functional test.Top coat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.It is unknown if a qualified handpiece was used.The ifu(instructions for use) instructs: company foldable iols are qualified for use with an company qualified delivery system (handpiece and cartridge) and ophthalmic viscosurgical device (ovd) combination.The ifu instructs that an company qualified delivery system and viscoelastic combination should be used.The use of an unqualified combination may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the implantation process.The ifu instructs: use holding forceps to grasp the lens by the optic edge and gently place the lens anterior side up into the back of the ovd-filled cartridge.The lens should be inserted until it is centered with or slightly past the outline etched into the top of the cartridge.The trailing haptic will extend from the proximal end of the cartridge.Position the trailing haptic to the left of the haptic post as shown in the detailed view.This will allow the plunger to go past the haptic during the initial advancement of the plunger into the cartridge.Verify the lens is positioned on the bottom surface of the cartridge.The haptic should be maintained to the left of the post when the lens is loaded correctly.Accurate positioning of the lens will decrease the potential for optic and haptic damage.The ifu instructs to completely fill the cartridge with ovd immediately prior to loading and delivery of the lens.Do not attempt to load the lens without adequate ovd in the device.Not adequately filling the device with viscoelastic will result in inadequate coverage of lens and the lens fold path with ovd, which may result in damage.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A health care professional reported that during an intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, scratched lenses, noted plastic fragments inside the cartridge after lens was inserted.Patient was left aphakic.Additional information was requested, but no further information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Additional information was requested, and received stating the patient was not left aphakic.Lens was replaced with another lens with same model and diopter lens on same day.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACRYSOF MULTIPIECE IOL
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON
6065 kyle lane
huntington WV 25702
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON
6065 kyle lane
huntington WV 25702
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key18895456
MDR Text Key337563568
Report Number1119421-2024-00471
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier00380652552516
UDI-Public00380652552516
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P930014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/16/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/13/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMA60AC
Device Catalogue NumberMA60AC.195
Device Lot Number15257590
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/20/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/18/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/24/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
DUOVISC VISCOELASTIC SYSTEM; MONARCH II IOL DELIVERY SYSTEM, CARTRIDGE B; MONARCH IOL DELIVERY SYSTEM, INJECTOR, UNSPECIFIED
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-