It was reported that, a plaintiff underwent a primary left thr in 2017, and later experienced loosening of the bicon-plus titanium shell 5-56 non-cem and pain when walking.Therefore, a revision surgery was performed in 2019, during which the cup and head were exchanged with a larger cemented cup and 5 xl head.No further complications related to this adverse event were reported.
|
Additional information: h6 (component code, type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Results of investigation: it was reported that, a plaintiff underwent a primary left total hip replacement in 2017, and later experienced loosening of the bicon-plus titanium shell 5-56 non-cem and pain when walking.Therefore, a revision surgery was performed in 2019, during which the cup and head were exchanged with a larger cemented cup and 5 xl head.The device intended for use in treatment was not returned for investigation.A product evaluation was not possible.A review of the production documentation did not detect any deviation that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.The review of historical complaints for the alleged device revealed no additional similar complaints reported for the same batch, and 1 additional similar complaint for the same product number over the past 12 months with similar failure mode.A review of past corrective actions was performed.No further escalation is required.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode, occurrence and severity of the reported issue.The instructions for use (lit.No.12.23, ed.03/21) states "osseointegration problem/loosening of implant not related to bone-ingrowth" as a ¿potential medical device problem¿ in combination with the implantation of a hip prosthesis.Based on the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported loosening could not be concluded.However, we are unable to rule out if the component loosening was a result from failure to achieve initial fixation and the patient¿s history of multiple revision surgeries as contributing factors to the reported events.Furthermore, it cannot be concluded there was a mal performance of the implant or an implant failure.The pain was likely the result of the component loosening.The performed investigation does not lead to an accurately determined cause.There is no evidence that the reported devices failed to meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.Due to insufficient information, it is not possible to indicate factors which could have contributed to the reported event.There is no need for further actions.Nevertheless, smith + nephew will continue to monitor this device for similar issues.This complaint will be reopened should additional information or the device be received.
|