The urea reagent lot number and expiration date were not provided.The field service engineer (fse) found the sample probe was misadjusted the fse readjusted the sample probe, adjusted the reagent probe wash's rinsing volume, adjusted the basins' water levels, and increased the gear pump pressure.Following the service actions, repeatability testing and qc results were acceptable.The service actions resolved the issue.
|
The initial reporter complained of discrepant results for 1 patient urine sample tested for urea on a cobas 8000 c 701 module.The initial result was 2.929 g/l.The sample was repeated 3 times with results of 8.913 g/l, 1.422 g/l with an invalidating data flag, and 5.545 g/l.
|