• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN SPIDER FX; TEMPORARY CAROTID CATHETER FOR EMBOLIC CAPTURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN SPIDER FX; TEMPORARY CAROTID CATHETER FOR EMBOLIC CAPTURE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SPD2-060-320
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/09/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Physician attempted to use a spider fx embolic protection device/guidewire during treatment of a fibrous lesion the patient¿s proximal common carotid artery.Severe vessel tortuosity and little vessel calcification were reported.Lesion exhibited 90% stenosis.There were no abnormalities reported in relation to anatomy.The ifu (instruction for use) was followed during preparation, procedure, post-procedure.The lesion was post dilated.Tip detachment was reported as the surgery was about to end.After the spider was finally retracted, it was discovered that the guidewire tail of the spider was separated from the spider filter.The spider body was retracted, but the guidewire tail remained in the blood vessel.The surgeon was worried that the guidewire tail would be rushed into the skull by the blood flow.Therefore, the surgeon first selected a non-medtronic stent, attached it to the broken guidewire, and used the stent to press the separated guidewire tail against the blood vessel wall.No patient injury reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the patient was not harmed.The doctor believed that the tip of the spider's tip was damaged because the tip was separated from the spider and remained in the blood vessel.Normally, the tip of the spider came out together with the spider body, but this time the tip was separated from the spider body, so the doctor thought that the tip of the spider tip was damaged.There was no difficulties in placing the spider at the beginning of the procedure and there was no difficulty removing the spider.A total of two stents were placed during the surgery, one to treat the lesion and the other to fix the distal tip.There was no carotid dissection and the reason for surgery was carotid stenosis.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPIDER FX
Type of Device
TEMPORARY CAROTID CATHETER FOR EMBOLIC CAPTURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18904656
MDR Text Key337672297
Report Number2183870-2024-00085
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K063204
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberSPD2-060-320
Device Lot NumberB563873
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/08/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/14/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/19/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/11/2024
Date Device Manufactured05/14/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-