It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the left superficial femoral artery via right groin, the device allegedly made abnormal noise upon activation.It was further reported that the spring on the end of the catheter tip was allegedly stretched out and dangling.There was no reported patient injury,.
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 04/2026).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the catheter was returned for evaluation and hence, it was physically investigated.The break and stretching of the helix were not observed during investigation and therefore, can not be confirmed.During physical investigation, the catheter was blocked and was not able to run in the water.The tube of the catheter was cut open and a lot of bodily material blocking it was found.Mechanical jam of the catheter was observed during investigation, the reported noise can appear in the event of mechanical jam.Therefore, the investigation cannot be confirmed for the reported break and stretching of the helix issues.However, the investigation is confirmed for the reported noise and identified mechanical jam issues.A clear root cause could not be identified but a blockage of the catheter represents a known inherent risk.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 04/2026), g3, h6 (device) h11: b5, d3, g1, h6 (method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|