• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH CROSSFIRE ECCENTRIC INSERT 10; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH CROSSFIRE ECCENTRIC INSERT 10; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number S-2301C-2846
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Subluxation (4525); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/20/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Patient reported a right hip revision due to liner breaking.Head, cup and insert revised to a larger size.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.If additional information is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device information received.Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving an other hip liner was reported.The event was confirmed via medical review.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: at and undisclosed distant date the patent had a primary hip replacement with trochanteric cabling performed.This went on to be significantly painful and on 4/5/23 a revision surgery was performed with exchange of the shell, liner and femoral head.The surgeon noted in his operative report that the acetabular liner had fractured and there was wear of the anterior portion of the metal acetabular shell.As a result, there was extensive metallosis throughout the joint needing extensive debridement.7 months later the patient again had a fractured liner requiring a second revision.The surgeon did not opine as to the reason for this early failure of the polyethylene liner.It is confirmed the patient underwent two revision tha surgeries due to mechanical complication of a tha.Medical review addendum: this review demonstrated radiographic evidence of lateral subluxation of the hip consistent with liner breakage, there is further radiographic and implant sheet evidence confirming revision surgery.Product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to crack/fracture of the liner.At and undisclosed distant date the patent had a primary hip replacement with trochanteric cabling performed.This went on to be significantly painful and on (b)(6) 2023 a revision surgery was performed with exchange of the shell, liner and femoral head.The surgeon noted in his operative report that the acetabular liner had fractured and there was wear of the anterior portion of the metal acetabular shell.As a result, there was extensive metallosis throughout the joint needing extensive debridement.7 months later the patient again had a fractured liner requiring a second revision.The surgeon did not opine as to the reason for this early failure of the polyethylene liner.It is confirmed the patient underwent two revision tha surgeries due to mechanical complication of a tha.Medical review addendum: this review demonstrated radiographic evidence of lateral subluxation of the hip consistent with liner breakage, there is further radiographic and implant sheet evidence confirming revision surgery.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Patient reported a right hip revision due to liner breaking.Head, cup and insert revised to a larger size.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CROSSFIRE ECCENTRIC INSERT 10
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
juana hiciano
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key18921739
MDR Text Key337873899
Report Number0002249697-2024-00433
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327022810
UDI-Public07613327022810
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K974685
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/21/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberS-2301C-2846
Device Lot Number194168
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/20/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/18/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/30/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/21/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/29/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight73 KG
-
-