• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Cardiac Tamponade (2226)
Event Date 10/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: long s, sun y, xiao x, wang z, sun w, gao l, xia y, yin x.Benefit of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients with different etiologies.J cardiovasc dev dis.2023 oct 20;10(10):437.Doi: 10.3390/jcdd10100437.Pmid: 37887884; pmcid: pmc10607920.No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: long s, sun y, xiao x, wang z, sun w, gao l, xia y, yin x.Benefit of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients with different etiologies.J cardiovasc dev dis.2023 oct 20;10(10):437.Doi: 10.3390/jcdd10100437.Pmid: 37887884; pmcid: pmc10607920.Objective/methods/study data: abstract (1) background: a plethora of studies have elucidated the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation (ca) for patients afflicted with atrial fibrillation (af) and concomitant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (lvef).Nevertheless, the literature on the benefits of ca in the specific etiological context of heart failure (hf) remains limited.This study delineates a comparative assessment of outcomes for patients with af and reduced lvef across the primary etiologies.(2) methods: our inquiry encompassed 216 patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure and an lvef of less than 50 percent who were referred to our institution for circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (cpvi) between the years 2016 and 2020.The selection criteria included a detailed medical history while excluding those suffering from valvular disease, congenital heart disease, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.In an effort to scrutinize varying etiologies, patients were stratified into three categories: dilated cardiomyopathy (dcm, n = 56, 30.6%), ischemic cardiomyopathy (icm, n = 68, 37.2%), and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (tic, n = 59, 32.2%).(3) results: following an average (±sd) duration of 36 ± 3 months, the prevalence of sinus rhythm was 52.1% in the dcm group, 50.0% in the icm group, and 68.14% in the tic group (p = 0.014).This study revealed a significant disparity between the dcm and tic groups (p = 0.021) and the icm and tic groups (p = 0.007), yet no significant distinction was discerned between the tic and icm groups (p = 0.769).Importantly, there were no significant variations in the application of antiarrhythmic drugs or recurrence of procedures among the three groups.The mortality rates were 14.29% for the dcm group and 14.71% for the icm group, which were higher than the 3.39% observed in the tic group (dcm vs.Tic p = 0.035 (hr = 4.50 (95%ci 1.38-14.67)), icm vs.Tic p = 0.021 (hr = 5.00 (95%ci 1.61-15.50))).A noteworthy enhancement in heart function was evidenced in the tic group in comparison to the dcm and icm groups, including a higher lvef (p < 0.001), diminution of lv end-diastolic diameter (p < 0.001), and an enhanced new york heart association classification (p = 0.005).Hospitalization rates for heart failure were discernibly lower in tic patients (0.98 (0,2) times) relative to those with dcm (1.74 (0,3) times, p < 0.01) and tic (1.78 (0,4) times, p < 0.001).Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and brief episodes were found to achieve superior clinical outcomes through a catheter ablation strategy.(4) conclusion: patients diagnosed with tic demonstrated a more pronounced benefit from catheter ablation compared to those with dcm and icm.This encompassed an augmented improvement in cardiac function, an enhanced maintenance of sinus rhythm, and a reduced mortality rate.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense device possibly associated with reported adverse events: thermocool smarttouch ablation catheter.Concomitant biosense webster devices that were used in this study: webster cs catheter, pentaray mapping catheter, lasso mapping catheter, carto mapping system concomitant non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: sl1 transseptal sheath & needle (synaptic medical), adverse event(s) and provided interventions possibly associated with unidentified thermocool smarttouch ablation catheter: qty 8 total (cardiac tamponade)(recognized procedural complication).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
3035526892
MDR Report Key18934250
MDR Text Key338033999
Report Number2029046-2024-00909
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P030031/S053
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/22/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/19/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CARTO MAPPING SYSTEM; LASSO MAPPING CATHETER; NEEDLE (SYNAPTIC MEDICAL); PENTARAY MAPPING CATHETER; SL1 TRANSSEPTAL SHEATH; WEBSTER CS CATHETER
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-