COVIDIEN PROTEGE EVERFLEX SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM STANDARD; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number PRB35-07-080-080 |
Device Problem
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/23/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Physician was attempting to use a protege everflex self-expanding stent with a 6fr non-medtronic sheath during a procedure to treat a calcified lesion in the patients right mid superficial femoral artery (sfa).Severe vessel calcification was reported.There were no abnormalities reported in relation to anatomy.There was no damage noted to packaging, i.E.Shelf carton, hoop/tray.There were no issues noted when removing the device from the hoop/tray.The ifu (instruction for use) followed during preparation, procedure, post-procedure without issue.Embolic protection was not used.The vessel was pre and post dilated.The device did not pass through a previously-deployed stent.It was reported the tip of stent catheter broke off after deployment and a snare was used to retrieve.The stent remains in the patient.There was no deformation noted to the deployed stent.A non-medtronic device was used to complete procedure.No patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis.The device was returned with the lock pin loosened, the distal tip of the device appeared to be missing from the device, the device was confirmed from the strain relief, the deployment paddles are approximately 145mm apart the device was unable to be flushed.A 0.035¿ guidewire was unable to advance through the device, it met with resistance, the lumen appeared blocked.The outer blue sheath was skived back with a scalpel and the distal tip was back up in the outer sheath.The distal tip was still attached to the inner sheath, medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|