• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9610TF29
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/27/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported by our affiliates in new zealand, it was a 29mm sapien 3 valve implant in aortic position by transfemoral approach.During procedure, more than usual resistance was found when advancing the commander delivery system through the esheath.When deploying the valve, blood was noted coming into the inflation syringe, despite this delivery system leakage, the valve was successfully deployed.Upon removal of the commander delivery system, a small hole near the flex tip was noticed, likely caused by a kink occurred from push force on insertion of the commander delivery system.The patient outcome was good post-procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Supplemental report submitted to include additional information received through pre-decontamination observation.Updated h6.Per pre-decontamination observation, a pin hole on the crimp balloon was found in the area next to the bond join between balloon and balloon shaft.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned for evaluation and an engineering evaluation was performed.The returned device was visually examined and the following was observed: kink in flex shaft at 6cm from flex tip.Pin-hole on proximal part of crimp balloon.Damage observed on flex shaft under x-ray.Double-wall thickness measurements of the crimp balloon were taken and the measurements met the specification.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaints of balloon leak and flex shaft damage were confirmed based on based on evaluation of returned device.However, no manufacturing non-conformance was identified during the evaluation.A review of the dhr did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaints.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.As reported, ''during procedure, more than usual resistance was found when advancing the commander delivery system through the esheath.When deploying the valve, blood was noted coming into the inflation syringe, despite this delivery system leakage, the valve was successfully deployed.Upon removal of the commander delivery system, a small hole near the flex tip was noticed, likely caused by a kink occurred from push force on insertion of the commander delivery system.'' per evaluation of the returned device, a pin-hole was observed on the proximal part of crimp balloon and the flex shaft was kinked at 6cm from flex tip.In this case, excessive manipulation may have been applied to overcome the reported resistance advancing the commander through the sheath, leading to the reported kink in the flex shaft.This kink could have interacted with the crimp balloon during valve alignment, causing the pin-hole on the crimp balloon.As such, available information suggests that procedural factors (excessive manipulation, damaged flex shaft) may have contributed to the reported leakage, while procedural factors (excessive manipulation) may have contributed to the reported kink.No device problem or manufacturing non-conformance that would have contributed to the complaint event was identified during the evaluation.No labeling/ifu deficiencies were identified.Therefore, no further escalation is required.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18956723
MDR Text Key338614856
Report Number2015691-2024-02199
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103193008
UDI-Public(01)00690103193008(17)250605(11)230606
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/24/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9610TF29
Device Lot Number65116970
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/27/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/21/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/25/2024
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/17/2024
05/23/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/06/2023
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-