As reported by our affiliates in new zealand, it was a 29mm sapien 3 valve implant in aortic position by transfemoral approach.During procedure, more than usual resistance was found when advancing the commander delivery system through the esheath.When deploying the valve, blood was noted coming into the inflation syringe, despite this delivery system leakage, the valve was successfully deployed.Upon removal of the commander delivery system, a small hole near the flex tip was noticed, likely caused by a kink occurred from push force on insertion of the commander delivery system.The patient outcome was good post-procedure.
|
The device was returned for evaluation and an engineering evaluation was performed.The returned device was visually examined and the following was observed: kink in flex shaft at 6cm from flex tip.Pin-hole on proximal part of crimp balloon.Damage observed on flex shaft under x-ray.Double-wall thickness measurements of the crimp balloon were taken and the measurements met the specification.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaints of balloon leak and flex shaft damage were confirmed based on based on evaluation of returned device.However, no manufacturing non-conformance was identified during the evaluation.A review of the dhr did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaints.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.As reported, ''during procedure, more than usual resistance was found when advancing the commander delivery system through the esheath.When deploying the valve, blood was noted coming into the inflation syringe, despite this delivery system leakage, the valve was successfully deployed.Upon removal of the commander delivery system, a small hole near the flex tip was noticed, likely caused by a kink occurred from push force on insertion of the commander delivery system.'' per evaluation of the returned device, a pin-hole was observed on the proximal part of crimp balloon and the flex shaft was kinked at 6cm from flex tip.In this case, excessive manipulation may have been applied to overcome the reported resistance advancing the commander through the sheath, leading to the reported kink in the flex shaft.This kink could have interacted with the crimp balloon during valve alignment, causing the pin-hole on the crimp balloon.As such, available information suggests that procedural factors (excessive manipulation, damaged flex shaft) may have contributed to the reported leakage, while procedural factors (excessive manipulation) may have contributed to the reported kink.No device problem or manufacturing non-conformance that would have contributed to the complaint event was identified during the evaluation.No labeling/ifu deficiencies were identified.Therefore, no further escalation is required.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|