• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX26A
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Perivalvular Leak (1457)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/29/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.H3 other text : the valve remains implanted.
 
Event Description
As reported by a field clinical specialist, post tavr (unknown date) with a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve, the valve failed due to regurgitation/pvl.A 26mm sapien 3 ultra resilia valve was implanted in a valve in valve procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted due to additional information received from implant registry.The investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
Per clinical review of medical records, a tee approximately 7 years post tavr showed moderate/severe stenosis and central ar as well as "symptomatic severe degeneration of the tavr valve".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted due to additional information and correction from medical records and from a product investigation.The following sections of this report have been updated: b.4, b.5, b.7, g.3, g.6, h.2 and h.6.The following sections of this report have been corrected: h.6 device code (from 1457 and 1250 to 1153).Per the instructions for use (ifu), structural valve deterioration (wear, fracture, calcification, leaflet tear/tearing from the stent posts, leaflet retraction, suture line disruption of components of a prosthetic valve, thickening, stenosis), and device degeneration are known potential risks associated with bioprosthetic heart valves.The ifu cautions that accelerated deterioration of the valve may occur in patients with an altered calcium metabolism.Long-term durability has not been established for the valve.Regular medical follow-up is advised to evaluate valve performance.Structural valve deterioration (svd) may be manifested as stenosis with thickened leaflets.Svd may be mild and not require any intervention or it may be moderate to severe.It can cause the heart to work harder to eject blood from the ventricle.Depending on the severity it could be an indication for valve replacement or medical intervention.Tissue calcification is a very common failure mode.The mechanisms for bioprosthetic heart valve tissue calcification are not yet fully understood.Many factors can contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification including patient-related (e.G., patient age, disease state, immune status, and other co-morbidities), pharmacological, and intrinsic properties of the valve itself.It is widely understood that patients with chronic renal disease and prior history of calcific stenosis of the native valve may be predisposed to bioprosthetic calcification.During the manufacturing process, all sapien thv valves are 100% visually inspected for defects and 100% functionally tested for proper coaptation under physiological backpressure conditions prior to release for distribution.Therefore, it is highly unlikely that a manufacturing defect or device malfunction contributed to the event.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a product malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Investigation results suggest/indicate a definitive root cause could not be determined due to limited information provided.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment, nor corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18959815
MDR Text Key338367544
Report Number2015691-2024-02217
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194357
UDI-Public(01)00690103194357(17)171013
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/01/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/13/2017
Device Model Number9750TFX26A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/29/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/22/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
04/23/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/19/2024
05/01/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-