A supplemental mdr is being submitted due to additional information and correction from information from the site and from a a product investigation.The following sections of this report have been updated: b.4, b.5, g.3, g.6, h.2 and h.6.The following sections of this report have been corrected: h.6 device code (replacing 1250 with 14547).Per the instructions for use (ifu), paravalvular leak (pvl) is a known potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter valve replacement (thv) procedure.The patient screening manual and the procedure didactic identify several procedural and anatomical factors which could contribute to pvl, including device malposition, inaccurate measurement of the landing zone, uneven distribution of calcium on the landing zone, bulky or severe calcification, a landing zone with an elliptical shape, and valve under or oversizing.Edwards extensively trains physicians before they are qualified to use the sapien thv (all models).The thv training manuals instructs the operator on proper imaging screening requirements, including the use of good quality echocardiography and/or computed tomography (ct) to appropriately measure the landing zone, assess the content and distribution of calcium, and other patient anatomical factors.Multiple imaging modalities should be considered during valve size selection.Contraindications, important considerations when assessing the valve, and choosing the proper thv are also discussed.The thv training manuals also instruct the operator on proper positioning and deployment of the valve, including patients screening and procedural considerations.Device preparation, approach, deployment, imaging, procedure-specific training manuals, and proctored procedures are also included.Per the instructions for use (ifu), valve malposition requiring intervention is a known potential adverse event associated with the transcatheter valve replacement (thv) procedure.There are multiple patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to malposition, including improper positioning before deployment, poor image intensifier angle, poor coaxial alignment of the valve and delivery system, minimally or bulky/severely calcified leaflets, preserved ejection fraction, significant landing zone calcification, loss of pacing capture, rapid deployment, the release of stored tension during deployment, inaccurate measurement of the landing zone, a landing zone with an elliptical shape, and valve under or oversizing.Additional risk factors in aortic position include a narrow sinotubular junction and severe septal hypertrophy.The ifu cautions that incorrect sizing of the valve may lead to paravalvular leak, migration, or embolization.The thv training manuals instruct the operator on proper positioning and deployment of the valve, including all procedural and anatomical considerations.Physicians are extensively trained by edwards before they are qualified to use the sapien thv (all models).Training includes patient screening, device preparation, approach, deployment, imaging, procedure-specific training manuals, and proctored procedures.The correct alignment and positioning of the device at the point of deployment is emphasized as a key factor in the placement and fixation of the device.Operators are also instructed to use fluoroscopy as the primary method of visualization for positioning and deployment.In patients with high-risk anatomical features for malposition or embolization, a balloon valvuloplasty may indicate potential balloon movement during valve deployment.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a product malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Investigation results suggest/indicate procedural factors (rapid deployment) caused or contributed to this event.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment, nor corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
|