Model Number LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM |
Device Problems
Incorrect Interpretation of Signal (1543); Structural Problem (2506)
|
Patient Problems
Arrhythmia (1721); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/16/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The patient was inappropriately treated 15 times by the lifevest.The patient's neurological status at the time of the event is unknown.Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (af with rvr), nsvt, multiple counting and motion artifact contributed to the false detection.The response buttons were not pressed during the event.No injury was reported from the treatment.The patient was in the hospital prior to the event, during the event, and remained there following the event.The patient ended use of the lifevest.No deficiencies were alleged against the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The monitor and electrode belt have not been returned for evaluation.Based on the data available at this time, there is no indication of a device malfunction causing or contributing to the inappropriate treatment.Inappropriate defibrillations are an anticipated risk associated with the use of the lifevest.Patients are instructed through alarms, voice messages, ifu, and training to press the response buttons to prevent an inappropriate defibrillation.The current commercial inappropriate defibrillation rate is consistent with the observed rate during the pivotal clinical trial (b)(4) (0.69% per patient-month with 90% confidence).A summary of the safety and effectiveness data (ssed), including the inappropriate defibrillation safety objective supporting fda's approval of the lifevest, can be found at http://www.Accessdata.Fda.Gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/p010030b.Pdf.The lifevest detection algorithm complies with iec 60601-2-4 performance requirements for sensitivity and specificity.
|
|
Event Description
|
A us distributor reported that an electrode belt was unable to complete essential performance testing.The patient was inappropriately treated 15 times by the lifevest.The patient's neurological status at the time of the event is unknown.Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (af with rvr), nsvt, multiple counting and motion artifact contributed to the false detection.The response buttons were not pressed during the event.No injury was reported from the treatment.The patient was in the hospital prior to the event, during the event, and remained there following the event.The patient ended use of the lifevest.No deficiencies were alleged against the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluation of electrode belt has been completed.The reported problem (unable to complete incoming testing) has been confirmed.Upon investigation the cable connecting the distribution node (dn) to the rear therapy electrodes was pulled from the strain relief, damaging wires in the cable.The root cause for the strained cable was excessive force.No adverse event resulted from the damaged belt.The monitor and electrode belt have not been returned for evaluation.Based on the data available at this time, there is no indication of a device malfunction causing or contributing to the inappropriate treatment.Inappropriate defibrillations are an anticipated risk associated with the use of the lifevest.Patients are instructed through alarms, voice messages, ifu, and training to press the response buttons to prevent an inappropriate defibrillation.The current commercial inappropriate defibrillation rate is consistent with the observed rate during the pivotal clinical trial g960083 (0.69% per patient-month with 90% confidence).A summary of the safety and effectiveness data (ssed), including the inappropriate defibrillation safety objective supporting fda's approval of the lifevest, can be found at http://www.Accessdata.Fda.Gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/p010030b.Pdf.The lifevest detection algorithm complies with iec 60601-2-4 performance requirements for sensitivity and specificity.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|