• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C0835
Device Problems Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/09/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left subclavian artery using ruby coils, a packing coil (pc), and a non-penumbra microcatheter.It should be noted that the patient¿s anatomy was mildly tortuous.During the procedure, the physician successfully implanted three ruby coils and one pc into the target vessel using the microcatheter.While advancing another ruby coil through the proximal length of the microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance and the ruby coil would not advance any further.While attempting to remove the ruby coil, the coil unintentionally detached within the microcatheter.Therefore, the microcatheter containing the detached ruby coil was removed.It was reported that the ruby coil was flushed out of the microcatheter.The procedure was completed using a new ruby coil and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation revealed that the pet lock was separated on the proximal end of the pusher assembly, the pull wire was retracted out of the distal tip of the pusher assembly.If this occurs, the embolization coil will detach from its pusher assembly.This typically occurs during a successful detachment attempt, and therefore, the root cause of the reported complaint cannot be determined.Further evaluation revealed kinks along the length of the pusher assembly and the detached embolization had offset coil winds along its length.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during packaging of the device for return to penumbra.Due to the returned condition, the ruby coil was unable to be functionally tested.Therefore, the root cause of the reported resistance during the procedure could not be determined.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key18984110
MDR Text Key339221224
Report Number3005168196-2024-00108
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548018386
UDI-Public814548018386
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,04/10/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/26/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0835
Device Lot NumberF00001749
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/20/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received03/29/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/29/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-