This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the results of the legal manufacturer's final investigation.Corrected fields: d4, e1 (telephone number should be blank) and h4.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over 1 year since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation it is likely that the mechanism causing the breakage of the probe might be the following: 1) during the output activation in seal & cut mode, the distal end of the probe was slightly contacting a thin equipment, causing spark generation.2) a force was applied to the probe during spark generation.3) cracks occurred in the probe due to the load applied to the probe during tissue grasping and seal & cut output.Also, the probe damage error (u504) occurred.4) due to continuous use of the device, the cracks on the probe progressed.This led to breakage of the probe.However, the root cause was unable to be specified.The event can be prevented by following the instructions for use: ¿ do not grasp or let the probe tip contact hard objects such as metal clips, stapler, or other instruments (e.G., uterine manipulator).Also, be careful to avoid contacting the probe tip with those accidentally.Particularly during activation, a scratch on the probe tip could occur due to ultrasonic vibration, which leads the probe tip to break and fall off into the body cavity.In addition, the high-frequency (rf bipolar) current flows through the metal and generates spark discharge, which may cause burns and decrease functionalities.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|