• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.O.M. WORLD OF MEDICINE GMBH AIRSEAL IFS, 110V; INSUFFLATOR, LAPAROSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.O.M. WORLD OF MEDICINE GMBH AIRSEAL IFS, 110V; INSUFFLATOR, LAPAROSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number AS-IFS1
Device Problem Gas Output Problem (1266)
Patient Problem Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 03/11/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not expected to be returned for evaluation and review.However, the complaint investigation is not complete at this time.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Event Description
Conmed japan reported on behalf of the customer that as-ifs1, airseal ifs, 110v, was being used during a robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy procedure on (b)(4)2024 when it was reported ¿damage to organs occurred due to prolonged exclusion.The set pressure of the air seal changed from 12 to 20 mmhg without my knowledge and remained at 20 mmhg until the end of pneumoperitoneum.As of now, the patient's condition has been confirmed up to the point where he was transferred to the icu, but the patient's condition after that is unknown.As for the hospitalization period, the patient's condition is improving steadily, and it is expected that the patient will be discharged within the scheduled period.¿.It was confirmed that the operating room staff had their elbows resting on the air seal body and their hands were close to the lcd panel for a long time, which may have caused the pneumoperitoneum pressure settings to change.Further assessment questioning found that ¿when asked what is meant by prolonged exclusion the reporter said, "this indicates that the organ has been compressed for a long period of time.".The procedure was completed without delay.This report is being raised on the reported injury due to the patient¿s organs being compressed and extended hospitalization to the icu.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device will not be returned, and no photographic evidence was provided.Therefore, a device malfunction cannot be verified.The service history was reviewed, and no data was found.A device history record (dhr) was requested and to date, a response was not received; therefore, a review cannot be conducted.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of 1 complaint, regarding 1 device, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be (b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the manufacturer is not liable for direct or consequential damages, and the warranty becomes null and void if the device and/or the accessories are improperly used, prepared, or maintained; the instructions and rules in the instructions for use are not adhered to.The functional test must be performed prior to each surgery.Because the functional test is performed during initial start up, the unit must be power cycled (off/on) prior to each surgery.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Event Description
Conmed japan reported on behalf of the customer that as-ifs1, airseal ifs, 110v, was being used during a robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy procedure on (b)(6) 2024 when it was reported ¿damage to organs occurred due to prolonged exclusion.The set pressure of the air seal changed from 12 to 20 mmhg without my knowledge and remained at 20 mmhg until the end of pneumoperitoneum.As of now, the patient's condition has been confirmed up to the point where he was transferred to the icu, but the patient's condition after that is unknown.As for the hospitalization period, the patient's condition is improving steadily, and it is expected that the patient will be discharged within the scheduled period¿.It was confirmed that the operating room staff had their elbows resting on the air seal body and their hands were close to the lcd panel for a long time, which may have caused the pneumoperitoneum pressure settings to change.Further assessment questioning found that ¿when asked what is meant by prolonged exclusion the reporter said, "this indicates that the organ has been compressed for a long period of time".The procedure was completed without delay.This report is being raised on the reported injury due to the patient¿s organs being compressed and extended hospitalization to the icu.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AIRSEAL IFS, 110V
Type of Device
INSUFFLATOR, LAPAROSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.O.M. WORLD OF MEDICINE GMBH
salzufer 8
berlin, 10587
GM  10587
Manufacturer (Section G)
W.O.M. WORLD OF MEDICINE GMBH
salzufer 8
berlin 10587
GM   10587
Manufacturer Contact
samantha dewberry
525 french road
utica, NY 13502
3152230184
MDR Report Key18994507
MDR Text Key338889854
Report Number1320894-2024-00084
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HIF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K190303
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Catalogue NumberAS-IFS1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-