|
Catalog Number AS-IFS1 |
Device Problem
Gas Output Problem (1266)
|
Patient Problem
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Date 03/11/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device is not expected to be returned for evaluation and review.However, the complaint investigation is not complete at this time.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|
|
Event Description
|
Conmed japan reported on behalf of the customer that as-ifs1, airseal ifs, 110v, was being used during a robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy procedure on (b)(4)2024 when it was reported ¿damage to organs occurred due to prolonged exclusion.The set pressure of the air seal changed from 12 to 20 mmhg without my knowledge and remained at 20 mmhg until the end of pneumoperitoneum.As of now, the patient's condition has been confirmed up to the point where he was transferred to the icu, but the patient's condition after that is unknown.As for the hospitalization period, the patient's condition is improving steadily, and it is expected that the patient will be discharged within the scheduled period.¿.It was confirmed that the operating room staff had their elbows resting on the air seal body and their hands were close to the lcd panel for a long time, which may have caused the pneumoperitoneum pressure settings to change.Further assessment questioning found that ¿when asked what is meant by prolonged exclusion the reporter said, "this indicates that the organ has been compressed for a long period of time.".The procedure was completed without delay.This report is being raised on the reported injury due to the patient¿s organs being compressed and extended hospitalization to the icu.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device will not be returned, and no photographic evidence was provided.Therefore, a device malfunction cannot be verified.The service history was reviewed, and no data was found.A device history record (dhr) was requested and to date, a response was not received; therefore, a review cannot be conducted.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of 1 complaint, regarding 1 device, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be (b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the manufacturer is not liable for direct or consequential damages, and the warranty becomes null and void if the device and/or the accessories are improperly used, prepared, or maintained; the instructions and rules in the instructions for use are not adhered to.The functional test must be performed prior to each surgery.Because the functional test is performed during initial start up, the unit must be power cycled (off/on) prior to each surgery.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|
|
Event Description
|
Conmed japan reported on behalf of the customer that as-ifs1, airseal ifs, 110v, was being used during a robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy procedure on (b)(6) 2024 when it was reported ¿damage to organs occurred due to prolonged exclusion.The set pressure of the air seal changed from 12 to 20 mmhg without my knowledge and remained at 20 mmhg until the end of pneumoperitoneum.As of now, the patient's condition has been confirmed up to the point where he was transferred to the icu, but the patient's condition after that is unknown.As for the hospitalization period, the patient's condition is improving steadily, and it is expected that the patient will be discharged within the scheduled period¿.It was confirmed that the operating room staff had their elbows resting on the air seal body and their hands were close to the lcd panel for a long time, which may have caused the pneumoperitoneum pressure settings to change.Further assessment questioning found that ¿when asked what is meant by prolonged exclusion the reporter said, "this indicates that the organ has been compressed for a long period of time".The procedure was completed without delay.This report is being raised on the reported injury due to the patient¿s organs being compressed and extended hospitalization to the icu.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|