|
Model Number FG15150-0615-1S |
Device Problems
Material Integrity Problem (2978); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/14/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received a report that during the insertion of the pipeline device to the microcatheter, the healthcare provider (hcp) noticed high friction forces to the point that the device got stuck and the system had to be removed.When trying to extract the ped system from the microcatheter, there was also high forces needed and when finally extracted there was also some kind of polymer that went out with the ped system.There was catheter resistance in the proximal portion of the catheter.No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.The device and any accessories were prepared as indicated in the ifu.The catheter was flushed as indicated in the ifu.Additional information was received clarifying that when the manufacturer representative (rep) pulled the pipeline pushwire out of t he catheter, they noticed some kind of clear polymer that went out with it.The polymer came out of the catheter.The rep did not notice any damage to the pushwire or catheter.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: as found condition: the pipeline vantage shield embolization device and phenom 27 catheter were returned for analysis within a shipping box; and within a plastic bio-pouch.The pipeline vantage shield pusher was returned outside the phenom 27 catheter.¿ damage location details: no bend found on the pipeline flex with pusher.The distal hypotube and ptfe shrink tubing were found to be intact with no signs of elongation.The distal and proximal dps restraints were found to be intact.The dps sleeves were found intact with no signs of damage.No defects were found with the distal marker, re-sheathing marker, arms or with the proximal bumper.However, proximal tip coil was found to be stretched.The braid was returned already detached from the pusher; therefore, the proximal and distal ends could not be identified.The distal and proximal ends of the pipeline vantage shield were found fully opened and damaged.No flash or voids molded were observed in the hub.No bent or kink was found with catheter body.The catheter tip, marker band were examined; and no damages were found.No other anomalies were observed.Testing/analysis: the total and usable lengths of phenom 27 catheter was measured to be within specification.The catheter was flushed with water and water exited out of the distal tip.The catheter was then tested by running an in-house 0.0265¿ mandrel through catheter tip and hub.The mandrel successfully passed through the catheter hub and tip with no issues.Conclusion: based on the analysis findings, the pipeline vantage shield and phenom 27 catheter were confirmed to have resistance as the pipeline vantage shield was found to be damaged.From the damages seen on the pipeline vantage shield braid (fraying) and tip coil (stretching); it appears there was high force used.It is likely these damages occurred when the customer attempted to advance and retrieve the pipeline vantage through the phenom 27 catheter against resistance.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|