Model Number 7300TFX25 |
Device Problems
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 12/20/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the device was not returned for evaluation.Attempts to retrieve the device and additional information are in process.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry (ipr).This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.It was reported via the implant patient registry that this valve model 7300tfx25 implanted in mitral position was explanted from a 75-year-old patient after an implant duration of three (3) days for unknown reason.A bioprosthetic heart valve was implanted in replacement.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry (ipr).This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.It was reported via the implant patient registry that this valve model 7300tfx25 implanted in mitral position was explanted from a 75-year-old patient after an implant duration of three (3) days due to a developing paravalvular leak caused by device dehiscence, as the mitral prosthesis was pulling loose around the p1 region where the sutures had been placed shallower to avoid damage to the circumflex.A bioprosthetic heart valve was implanted in replacement.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Added information to section b5, h6 (device code(s)), h6 (type of investigation).The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the subject device was not returned for evaluation.Device dehiscence or suture torn out may occur early or late.When it occurs in the intraoperative period, it is typically a result of inadequate device implantation in combination with friable myocardial tissue.Valve dehiscence is not a malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency of the device.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regard to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.The most likely cause is procedural factors, including ".The sutures had been placed shallower to avoid damage to the circumflex".
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|