• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVOLUTFX-26
Device Problems Gradient Increase (1270); Perivalvular Leak (1457); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Non specific EKG/ECG Changes (1817); Valvular Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4449)
Event Date 03/25/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id l-evolutfx-2329 (lot: 0011827949); product type: 0195-heart valves; implant date ; explant date section d references the main component of the system.Other medical products in use during the event include: brand name evolut fx dcs; product id d-evolutfx-2329 (lot: 0011784873); product type: 0195-heart valves.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, the patient had heavy calcification that continued to the left ventricular outflow tract (lvot) from the n-l commissure, therefore care was taken to select a safe size for balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav).Upon first deployment attempt, the valve dislodged and was recaptured. upon second deployment attempt, when the valve deployed a little deeper, the pig tail catheter became stuck during recapture, therefore time was taken to pull the system into the ascending aorta to readjust it. on the third deployment attempt, the valve was placed however the patient had an atrio-ventricular block (avb), so the procedure was continued with temporary pacing. quite a lot of paravalvular leak (pvl) remained after valve placement therefore a post-implant bav was performed twice, with 18mm and 20mm balloons.Moderate pvl remained. the pressure gradient was reduced from 62mmhg to 7mmhg.The avb did not resolve by the time the patient returned to the intensive care unit (icu), so the patient left the operating room with temporary pacing.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated b.5.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that a pre-balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed with an 18 millimeter (mm) non-medtr onic balloon.The deployment starting point was at the bottom of the pigtail catheter.The first deployment attempt, the valve dislodged to the ascending aorta side.During the second deployment attempt, the deployment depth was a little deeper.When attempting to pass the system through the aortic valve, the pigtail catheter moved to the left ventricular side and became stuck.The valve was recaptured to eliminate interference with the pigtail catheter.It took time for the blood pressure to return to normal on the ascending side.The third deployment, the valve was deployed at a depth of 4 mm on the non-coronary cusp (ncc) and 5 mm on the left coronary cusp (lcc).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT FX VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key19030807
MDR Text Key339212941
Report Number2025587-2024-02062
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/03/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEVOLUTFX-26
Device Catalogue NumberEVOLUTFX-26
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/05/2024
Date Device Manufactured07/29/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
"SEE H11...."
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-