Catalog Number 50000000 |
Device Problems
Circuit Failure (1089); Overheating of Device (1437)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/14/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that biomed had the artic sun device that was not cooling they tried to do the calibration and it failed for an error 80(water check time out - unable to reach calibration temperature) for not cooling, confirmed mixing pump had failed and the device was due for the 2000-hour preventive maintenance, sending quote for service.Per sample evaluation results on (b)(6) 2024, it was reported that the hot side connection between the ac main voltage circuit card and the power inlet module shows signs of electrical overstress.Tanks seals had dry rot and cracking.Mixing pump motor had bearing that was seizing.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that biomed had the artic sun device that was not cooling they tried to do the calibration and it failed for an error 80(water check time out - unable to reach calibration temperature) for not cooling, confirmed mixing pump had failed and the device was due for the 2000-hour preventive maintenance, sending quote for service.Per sample evaluation results on 14mar2024, it was reported that the hot side connection between the ac main voltage circuit card and the power inlet module shows signs of electrical overstress.Tanks seals had dry rot and cracking.Mixing pump motor had bearing that was seizing.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported issue was confirmed.It was concluded that the following was the root cause: supplier ¿ root cause o inadequate verification and validation activities of the crimping process o single pull test did not provide stability of process o evidence was not provided when requested for maintenance of records or crimp tools o no crimp cross-sections provided.A dhr review is not required.A labeling review is not required because labeling could not have prevented this issue.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|