Catalog Number 80219 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/21/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex are identified in d2 and g4.The medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a video was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the superficial femoral artery via the femoral artery approach, there was a gap between the catheter and the handle which allegedly resulted in an unstable thrombosuction.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a thrombectomy and atherectomy procedure in the superficial femoral artery via the femoral artery approach, there was a gap between the catheter and the handle which allegedly resulted in an unstable thrombosuction.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical sample was returned for evaluation and a catheter was physically investigated.During physical investigation, the test guidewire went through without any resistance, and the catheter ran smoothly and did not show any malfunction.Nominal level of aspiration was reached.No break or detachment that was mentioned in the user report was observed during physical investigation.Also, there was no apparent adverse event.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported break and detachment issues.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|