• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/01/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: since it was not possible to distinguish between intuity valves and intuity elite valves in the rdavr group, ni was used in d1, d4 and g4 as model number is unknown.The date of the event is unknown; however, according to the article, the study period was from january 2012 to january 2017.Thus, the first day of the reported study period (1 of january 2012) was used in fiel b3 as date of event.Article citation: taghiyev zt, bechtel m, schlomicher m, useini d, taghi hn, moustafine v, strauch jt.Early term results of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement versus standard bioprosthesis implantation combined with coronary artery bypass grafting.Thorac cardiovasc surg.2023 oct;71(7):519-527.The subject device is not available for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Medical article "early-term results of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement versus standard bioprosthesis implantation combined with coronary artery bypass grafting" , the following event was identified as pertaining to edwards devices: eight (8) patients with unknow edwards aortic valves implanted in the aortic position presented severe patient prosthesis mismatch (ppm) after an unknown implant duration.Four (4) patients belonged to the rapid-deployment edwards intuity valve system (rdavr) group and the other four (4) patients belonged to the conventional sutured valves (csavr) group.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the serial number was not provided.Therefore, the device history record (dhr) could not be reviewed.Patient prosthesis mismatch (ppm) is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is too small in relation to body size.Its main hemodynamic consequence is to generate higher than expected gradients through a normally functioning prosthetic valve.Ifu review unable to be performed as the model is unknown.A definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient and/or procedural factors likely caused or contributed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NI
Type of Device
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
one edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key19048958
MDR Text Key339431225
Report Number2015691-2024-02603
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
NI
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/05/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/13/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-