The other adverse events questionnaire was reviewed for potential causes of the reported issue.Based on this review, the incident occurring before the implant of the device, implanting the device at an off-label location, and implanting the stimulator too close to the target nerve have been ruled out as potential causes.Additionally, bone or tissue was not inadvertently punctured during the procedure as the device was only implanted in the soft tissue.The commercial team member explained that the procedure went smoothly and nothing was out of the ordinary which would leave them to believe that the fractured pelvis occurred during the surgery.The commercial team member also noted that the patient has bone cancer and believes that the cancer could be in the patient's pelvis area.The stimulator is used to treat pain.Although the reported issue could not be confirmed, the patient is a poor candidate due to health, weight, age, mental capacity as the patient has bone cancer (user error-clinician).Rates reviewed at the most recent complaint trending meeting do not indicate a significant increase in other adverse events issues.Other adverse events issues rates remain acceptably low; thus, a capa is not required.Other adverse events issues rates will continue to be tracked and trended.
|