• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVOLUTFX-26
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem Valvular Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4449)
Event Date 03/27/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, the patient had calcified anatomy for which a pre-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was not performed.Per the medtronic sales representative, in hindsight a pre-implant bav should have been performed.When the valve was at 80% deployment, the implant depth was around 3mm on the non-coronary cusp (ncc) and 4mm on the left coronary cusp (lcc).Some constraint was noted on the ncc side.The valve was deployed successfully, however dislodged up to -2mm on the ncc and 2mm on the lcc after deployment.Echocardiogram and radiographic cine showed moderate-severe paravalvular leak (pvl), therefore a post-implant bav was performed.Foreshortening occurred and the valve was at around -5 to -6mm on the ncc side.The team decided to treat the patient with a second valve.A new valve and delivery catheter system (dcs) were inserted into the aorta and positioned through the first valve, down to the annulus.At that point, visualization of the cusp was poor.The implanted valve had further dislodged, and the skirt was in front of the coronary arteries.Decision was made to abort the second evolut fx, to snare the dislodged valve and implant a non-medtronic (edwards sapien) valve in the aortic annulus.The second evolut fx and the dcs were removed from the patient.The dislodged valve was ballooned and snared up above the coronary arteries, but still in the ascending aorta.The sapien valve was then deployed successfully in the aortic annulus.A procedural delay occurred as a result of the dislodgement, with total procedural time of around 3 hours.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id: l-evolutfx-2329, product type: compression loading system (cls).Product id: d-evolutfx-2329, product type: delivery catheter system (dcs).Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that after the post-implant bav was performed, severe pvl occurred.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that during advancement of the second dcs, the dcs contributed to the valve dislodging further when attempting to implant the second medtronic transcatheter valve.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This is a system report.The section d information is for the primary device, which was in use with the following: brand name [deliv sys d-evolutfx-2329] product id [d-evolutfx-2] serial/lot [(b)(6)] use by date [2026-01-02] udi [(b)(4)].Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, the patient had calcified anatomy for which a pre-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was not performed.Per the medtronic sales representative, in hindsight a pre-implant bav should have been performed.When the valve was at 80% deployment, the implant depth was around 3mm on the non-coronary cusp (ncc) and 4mm on the left coronary cusp (lcc).Some constraint was noted on the ncc side.The valve was deployed successfully, however dislodged up to -2mm on the ncc and 2mm on the lcc after deployment.Echocardiogram and radiographic cine showed moderate-severe paravalvular leak (pvl), therefore a post-implant bav was performed.Foreshortening occurred and the valve was at around -5 to -6mm on the ncc side.The team decided to treat the patient with a second valve.A new valve and delivery catheter system (dcs) were inserted into the aorta and positioned through the first valve, down to the annulus.At that point, visualization of the cusp was poor.The implanted valve had further dislodged, and the skirt was in front of the coronary arteries.Decision was made to abort the second evolut fx, to snare the dislodged valve and implant a non-medtronic (edwards sapien) valve in the aortic annulus.The second evolut fx and the dcs were removed from the patient.The dislodged valve was ballooned and snared up above the coronary arteries, but still in the ascending aorta.The sapien valve was then deployed successfully in the aortic annulus.A procedural delay occurred as a result of the dislodgement, with total procedural time of around 3 hours.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received that after the post-implant bav was performed, severe pvl occurred.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received that during advancement of the second dcs, the dcs contributed to the valve dislodging further when attempting to implant the second medtronic transcatheter valve.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: h6.Eval code method updated for the delivery catheter system.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT FX VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key19059073
MDR Text Key339584227
Report Number2025587-2024-02146
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00763000370695
UDI-Public00763000370695
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/24/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/08/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEVOLUTFX-26
Device Catalogue NumberEVOLUTFX-26
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/15/2024
Date Device Manufactured07/03/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age87 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight57 KG
-
-