• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED72KIT
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Unraveled Material (1664); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 03/10/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the left internal carotid artery (ica) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max), a non-penumbra microcatheter, and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician advanced the red72 over the microcatheter through the neuron max to the target location.The microcatheter was then removed.While attempting to advance the red72 closer to the clot, the physician experienced resistance and kinked the distal length of the red72.While attempting to retract the red72 into the neuron max to relieve the slack on the red72, the physician experienced resistance and the red72 appeared to get stuck within the neuron max.It was then observed under fluoroscopy that the red72 fractured and began to unravel at the location of the kink.While removing the red72 and neuron max together, the fractured segment of the red72 detached in the aorta.The physician then made a contralateral access and used a snare device to successfully remove the fractured segment of the red72.The procedure was completed using another catheter and another sheath.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional device code 4: 2976.Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #01 mfr report: 3005168196-2024-00126.1.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem emboli is included as a possible complication in the instructions for use (ifu) for the penumbra system.Evaluation of the returned red72 confirmed a fracture.A kink and unraveled internal coil winds were present at the fractured location.If the red72 is advanced against resistance during use, damage such as a kink may occur.This kink may have contributed to the resistance experienced during retraction of the red72 through the neuron max and the kink subsequently worsened to a fracture during removal.Based on the reported event, the root cause of the resistance during advancement could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed kinks along the length of the red72.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint.The kinks on the distal fractured segment likely occurred during snaring and removal of the distal fractured segment from the patient¿s body.The kinks on the proximal fractured segment may have occurred during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the left internal carotid artery (ica) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max), a non-penumbra microcatheter, and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician advanced the red72 over the microcatheter through the neuron max to the target location.The microcatheter was then removed.While attempting to advance the red72 closer to the clot, the physician experienced resistance and kinked the distal length of the red72.While attempting to retract the red72 into the neuron max to relieve the slack on the red72, the physician experienced resistance and the red72 appeared to get stuck within the neuron max.It was then observed under fluoroscopy that the red72 fractured and began to unravel at the location of the kink.While removing the red72 and neuron max together, the red72 fractured.The physician then made a contralateral access and used a snare device to successfully remove the fractured segment of the red72.The procedure was completed using another catheter and another sheath.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key19059740
MDR Text Key339596689
Report Number3005168196-2024-00126
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948023949
UDI-Public815948023949
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K211654
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,04/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/08/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRED72KIT
Device Lot NumberH00003737
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received03/11/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/03/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
-
-