Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Section e.1: the initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The initial reporter email address was not available / reported.Section h.3: the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.Lake region medical performed a review of the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspection, and packaging of the lot 8512180.The history record indicates this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
The healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization procedure, the 4.5mm x 22mm enterprise® vascular reconstruction device (enc452212 / 8512180) was impeded in the introducer and could not be pushed into the microcatheter (competitor brand).The physician retracted the stent and observed that the stent component was released automatically; the stent body was prematurely separated from the delivery wire.The physician replaced the stent to complete the procedure using the original microcatheter.There was no report of any negative patient impact.On 29-mar-2024, additional information was received.Per the information, the targeted aneurysm was on the c6 segment of the internal carotid artery (ica).The replacement stent was another 4.5mm x 22mm enterprise® vascular reconstruction device (enc452212).The reported issue did not result in any delay in the procedure.
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report the investigational finding of the returned device.The complaint product was returned and received for evaluation and analysis.The investigation is documented below.Investigation summary: a non-sterile 4.5mm x 22mm enterprise® vascular reconstruction device was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Visual inspection was performed.It was noted that the stent was already detached from the unit and this remained inside the introducer.The introducer and the delivery wire were found to be in good condition (i.E., no kinks, no bends, and no elongations).The delivery wire and the introducer underwent to dimensional analyses; all measurements were found to be within specifications, including those specifications that control the attachment and delivery of the stent.Therefore, device failure is not suspected to be a contributing factor.The issue regarding a stent being released automatically was confirmed since the stent was found no longer attached to the delivery wire.Based on this observed condition, the issue documented that the stent was unable to be pushed into the microcatheter cannot be evaluated through a functional test.The stent must be attached to the delivery wire to perform the functional analysis.It is possible that the delivery wire was pulled sufficiently to disengage it from the stent in the attempt of retract the stent.Additionally, none of the returned components present damages that suggest that they were forcibly advanced.With the limited information available, a conclusive cause cannot be determined; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation and operator's technique, may have contributed to the reported failure.At this time, there is no evidence to support that the issue reported in the complaint is a result of a defect inherently related to the device.Lake region medical performed a review of the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspection, and packaging of the lot 8512180.The history record indicates this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.As part of the cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.It should be noted that multiple factors could cause product failure.The instructions for use (ifu) does contain the following recommendations: ¿ the introducer must be properly engaged with the infusion catheter hub to enable stent introduction into the infusion catheter.¿ do not apply undue force if resistance is encountered at any point during stent manipulation.Withdraw the unit and advance to a new one.¿ if resistance is felt while recapturing the stent, do not continue to recapture the device.Withdraw the infusion catheter slightly to unsheathe the stent (without exceeding the recapture limit), and then attempt to recapture the stent again.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|